Finding stable housing is one of the biggest challenges facing prison leavers. Access to public housing flattens the curve on聽recidivism.
鈥淕oing home鈥 is a classic metaphor for exiting prison. But most people exiting prison in Australia either expect to be homeless, or don鈥檛 know where they will be staying when released.
Our (the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute) shows post-release housing assistance is a potentially powerful lever in arresting the imprisonment鈥揾omelessness cycle.
We found ex-prisoners who get public housing have significantly better criminal justice outcomes than those who receive private rental assistance only.
The benefit, in dollars terms, of public housing outweighs the cost.
Read more:
There is strong evidence linking imprisonment and homelessness. Post-release homelessness and unstable housing is a . And prior imprisonment is a known predictor of homelessness. It is a vicious cycle.
People in prison often contend with:
People with such complex support needs are often deemed 鈥渢oo difficult鈥 for community-based support services and so end up entangled in the criminal justice system.
Also, prisons are themselves places of stress and suffering. So people leaving prison a high-needs group for housing assistance and support.
There are about 43,000 people in . Over the year there will be even more prison releases (because some people exit and enter multiple times).
According to the :
Ex-prisoners are the fastest growing client group for Australia鈥檚 .
Over the past decade, have been rising.
Meanwhile, 鈥 public housing provided by state governments, and the community housing provided by non-profit community organisations 鈥 has been declining in real terms.
We must turn both those trends around.
In our research, we investigated the effect of public housing on post-release pathways. We analysed data about a sample of people with complex support needs who had been in prison in NSW.
The de-identified data show peoples鈥 contacts before and after prison with various NSW government agencies, including criminal justice institutions and DCJ Housing, the state public housing provider.
We compared 623 people who received a public housing tenancy at some point after prison with a similar number of people who were eligible for public housing but received private rental assistance only (such as bond money).
On a range of measures, the public housing group had better criminal justice outcomes.
The charts below compare the number of police incidents for each group.
The first chart shows recorded police incidents for the private rental assistance group, which gradually rose over the period for which we have data.
The second chart shows police incidents for the public housing group: they also had a rising trend, until they received public housing (year 0 on the x-axis), after which police incidents went down 8.9% per year.
Police incidents, private rental assistance and public housing groups. Authors provided.
For the housed group:
When we put a dollar value on these benefits, providing a public housing tenancy is less costly than paying Rent Assistance in private rental (net benefit $5,000) or assisting through Specialist Homelessness Services (net benefit $35,000).
Unfortunately, public housing is in very short supply.
For our public housing group, the average time between release and public housing was five years. Others are never housed.
We interviewed corrections officers, reintegration support workers, housing workers, and people who had been in prison, across three states.
They were unanimous: there is a dearth of housing options for people exiting prison.
A Tasmanian ex-prisoner, who lived in a roof-top tent on his car on release, said:
You basically get kicked out the door and kicked in the guts and they say, 鈥楪o do whatever you need to do, see ya鈥.
Planning for release is often last-minute. A NSW reintegration support worker told us:
It鈥檚 not coordinated. We鈥檒l get a prison ringing up on the day of release saying, 鈥楥an you pick this woman up?鈥 on the day of release, when they knew it was coming months in advance. There鈥檚 no planning.
A housing worker in Victoria described those next steps as a series of unstable, short-term arrangements, beset by pitfalls:
They could easily be waiting a couple of years, realistically. And for them that鈥檚 a long time, and so far off in the distance it鈥檚 difficult to conceive of. And a long time in which for things could go wrong in their lives 鈥 to be homeless or back in prison, all sorts of things 鈥 What they do in the meantime: they couch surf, stay with family, stay in motels, stay in cars/stolen cars, stay with friends, sleep rough, all those things.
A Tasmanian corrections officer told us:
People want to come back to custody because they鈥檝e then got a roof over their head. They don鈥檛 have to worry; they鈥檙e getting fed, they can stay warm.
Community sector organisations specialising in supporting people in contact with the criminal justice system, such as the in NSW, do extraordinary work providing services and support that aim to break entrenched cycles of disadvantage and imprisonment.
However, this sector鈥檚 funding has been turbulent, marked by short-term programs.
In by some members of this research team, we saw the difference CRC made to 275 of its clients over a number of years. This evaluation found supported clients had 63% fewer custody episodes than a comparison group 鈥 a net cost saving to government of $10-16 million.
These support services would be even more effective if clients had more stable housing. As it is, specialist alcohol and other drug case workers are often spending their time dealing with clients鈥 housing crises.
Secure, affordable public housing is an anchor for people exiting prison as they work to build lives outside of the criminal justice system.
It is also a stable base from which to receive and engage with support services. It pays to invest in both.
, Senior Research Fellow, City Futures Research Centre, ; , Deputy Vice Chancellor Equity Diversity and Inclusion, Professor of Criminology, ; , Research Associate, ; , Senior Research Fellow, Yuwaya Ngarra-li, ; , Professor of Criminology, ; , Associate Professor, , and , Professor in Justice and Legal Studies, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies,
This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .